We are seeing presently an important
demonstration of Catholic/Evangelical unity in that both Catholic University of
America and Wheaton College are together sponsoring a lawsuit against the Department
of Health and Human Services protesting a recent requirement of the Affordable
Care Act. That Act requires that all religious institutions except churches, which
carry health insurance on their employees, must provide in that insurance,
payment for abortion-inducing drugs as well as contraceptives.
Although Catholics and Evangelicals are not
completely united on their opposition to contraception, we are united on the
issue of induced abortion. We both strongly believe that live begins at
conception; and no government has the right to violate that right by the
application of abortion-producing drugs or surgical procedures. We are most
certainly united in our belief that the government has no right to interfere
with our right to practice our religious beliefs; and that issue is the
sticking point in this whole matter. The Affordable Care Act, as interpreted by
the Executive Branch of our Federal Government, is requiring a limitation on
our right to freedom of religion.
In
1943, Justice Robert Jackson wrote in West Virginia State Board of Education v.
Barnette "If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, “it
is that no official . . . can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics,
nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess
by word or act their faith therein." This belief in the freedom of
religion must apply to all Americans who gather in voluntary association for
distinctively religious purposes, such as Christian education.
Chuck
Colson and John Neuhaus have written concerning our American Constitutional
system, "[T]his constitutional order is composed not just of rules and
procedures but is most essentially a moral experiment. . . . [W]e hold that
only a virtuous people can be free and just, and that virtue is secured by
religion. To propose that securing civil virtue is the purpose of religion is
blasphemous. To deny that securing civil virtue is a benefit of religion is
blindness."
This
blog post was redacted from the Wall Street Journal of 18 July 2012 in the
opinion section.
No comments:
Post a Comment