Abortion and Racism

In 2003 in the United States, white women had 165 abortions per 1000 live births; Hispanic women had 228 abortions per 1000 live births; and Black women had 491 abortions per 1000 live births. (Human Life Alliance, autumn 2009) Black women comprise 12% of the female population of America, but they account for 37% of the abortions! What could explain this great excess of abortion activity among women of color?
The obvious answer is the well-known racial targeting of abortion providers in the U.S.A. Planned parenthood is the largest abortion provider of abortions in our country; and that organization has continued the eugenic bias of its founder, Margaret Sanger. Ms. Sanger was a woman obsessed with the goals of sexual freedom of all people and the “science” of eugenics in the early years of the 20th Century when she founded Planned Parenthood. She openly stated that she wanted to eliminate the feeble minded and retarded by forced birth control; and she welcomed into her movement those who were dedicated to white supremacy and the elimination of Blacks. She founded the Negro Project designed to infiltrate the Black community with a “birth control for health” doctrine in the early part of the last century.
It seems ironic that today we have a Black President who supports Planned Parenthood in a very enthusiastic way. It seems that he is also dedicated to diminishing the numbers of the Black population.

Dare We Doubt?

There are three basic beliefs that our modern society holds very dear. I would like to define them for you:
 Multiculturalism: All cultural and belief systems are equally valid.
 Diversity: Cultural, racial, and sexual identity take precedence over the common good.
 Political correctness: Do not dare to challenge, question, or disagree.
Dare we doubt the truth of these? I should hope so! If any of you are interested in looking further into these beliefs, I would refer you to a good book: Diversity, The Invention of a Concept by Peter Wood of Boston University.

We Must Have An Anti-Abortion Proviso In Health Care Act

A simple read of H.R. 3200, the present health care act, being considered by the Senate and the House of Representatives will show that there is no mention of abortion in the bill. However, broad powers given to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, who is Kathleen Sebelius—an avowed pro-abortionist, would allow her and her department to pay private insurance companies and abortion clinics for abortions using federal money. It would also allow low-income clients to get money directly from the Federal Government to pay for their abortions.
This bill needs a strict and specifically worded proviso preventing the use of federal money for abortion. This kind of language has been voted down repeatedly by Democrat legislators. However, there is a strongly worded amendment, called the Stupak-Pitts amendment, which would specifically prohibit federal money from being used for abortions. http://www.nrlc.org/AHC/StupakPittsLetterSept282009.pdf
I would strongly request that you write to your Congressman and Senator to vote for the Stupak-Pitts amendment to H.R.3200.

Medical Malpractice Regulation, a “No, No” for Democrats!

Democrats in Congress and the Senate will not realistically approach the problem of medical malpractice costs because of opposition from the trial lawyers professional group (called the American Association of Justice). Howard Dean, former chair of the Democratic National Committee was asked why there is nothing in the health-care proposals about liability reform. Mr. Dean replied: “The reason that tort reform is not in the bill is because the people who wrote it did not want to take on the trial lawyers…And that is the plain and simple truth.”
Today, lawyer and administrative costs soak up 54¢ out of every malpractice dollar. It costs obstetricians $1000 in malpractice insurance costs for every baby they deliver.
Former Sen. John Edwards made a fortune bringing 16 cases against hospitals for babies born with cerebral palsy. Each of those tragic cases was worth millions in settlement. But according to a 2006 study at the National Institutes of Health, in 9 out of 10 cases of cerebral palsy nothing done by a doctor could have caused the condition.
We should all write our Congressmen about this big problem, which is causing huge medical service costs.
(This article was resourced from the Wall Street Journal 9/29/09 page A25.)

No waste, fraud, or abuse?? Are you talking about Washington?

Obama’s Claim: “Don’t pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut… That will never happen on my watch.”

The Truth: His plan proposes $500 billion in “savings” in Medicare by cutting “waste, fraud and abuse.” This is a sleight of hand as old as Washington, D.C., and it is one reason why our deficit is out of control. There is no budget line for “waste, fraud and abuse.” If there are $500 billion that can be saved, prove it now. Cut that “waste, fraud and abuse” now, and save the money now!
(A note from Gary Bauer.)

America, Do Not Slip on Afghanistan!

An NBC-Wall Street Journal poll taken 5 days ago indicated that 51% of Americans are somewhat or strongly opposed to increasing troop strength in Afghanistan. One third of respondents favor an immediate withdrawal from the war!
Pulling back from Afghanistan now would be a disastrous mistake for the United States. Afghanistan was the staging site for the 9/11 attack against the United States, and turning the area over, again, to the Taliban and Al Qaeda would only allow them to reinstitute their nefarious terrorist activities and show the world that America lacks the courage and stick-to-it necessary to complete a job that we have started. It would be a slap in the face to all who have sacrificed so much to accomplish the President’s campaign promises to finish the job in Afghanistan and rid the world of Al Qaeda once and for all.
Asymmetric warfare, such as the warfare in Afghanistan is not won by winning battles. The outcome of this kind of war is determined by which side can stay in the field the longest. A perfect example of this was the American Revolution. George Washington’s army did not win very many battles; but American fighters out-stayed the British army and were victorious because of that factor. In Afghanistan, is seems that the native Taliban fighters have an advantage in that they are fighting on their own home field. They have staying power!
In Afghanistan, it is imperative that America stay there long enough to get Afghan nationals trained up and ready to stay the course against an enemy that they hate almost as much as we, Americans, do—the Taliban. Only then, can we relax and bring our brave fighting men and women home.